Context
- The article analyses India’s plan to expand nuclear power capacity to 100 GW by 2047, supported by the SHANTI Act, 2025, and examines associated policy, technological, and energy-transition challenges.
- Source: Transforming India’s nuclear power landscape, The Hindu, April 6, 2026
Legislative Transformation: SHANTI Act, 2025
- Structural Shift: Ends monopoly of Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) by enabling private sector participation in nuclear power
- Institutional Reform: Provides statutory backing to Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB)
- Legal Replacement: Repeals Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010
- Investment Facilitation: Revises liability framework to attract domestic and foreign capital
- Implementation Need: Requires detailed subordinate rules for effective execution
Drivers of Nuclear Expansion
- Developmental Imperative: Achieving “Viksit Bharat” by 2047 demands significant increase in electricity generation
- Energy Transition: Shift from fossil fuel-based energy use to electricity across sectors
- Net Zero Target: Requires expansion of low-carbon baseload power
- Consumption Gap: India’s per capita electricity generation (1,418 kWh) far below global averages
- Structural Constraint: Only one-fifth of total energy consumption is electricity
Limitations of Renewable Energy Expansion
- Capacity-Generation Mismatch: Renewables form ~50% of capacity but contribute ~22% of generation
- Intermittency: Output depends on time, season, and geography
- Baseload Requirement: Continuous supply still dependent on thermal and nuclear sources
- Storage Dependency: Large-scale storage investments needed for renewables expansion
- Market Challenges: 40 GW renewable capacity stalled due to lack of power-purchase agreements
Current Energy Profile and Role of Nuclear Power
- Installed Capacity: 476 GW total (June 2025), with 8.8 GW nuclear
- Generation Share: Nuclear contributes ~3% of electricity generation
- Thermal Dominance: Provides ~75% of electricity despite ~50% capacity share
- Low-Carbon Baseload: Nuclear offers stable, continuous power unlike intermittent renewables
India’s Nuclear Power Evolution and Capacity Constraints
- Historical Beginning: First nuclear reactor commissioned at Tarapur in 1969
- Existing Fleet: 24 reactors operated by NPCIL with ~8,780 MW capacity
- Reactor Mix: BWR (Tarapur), VVER (Kudankulam), PHWR (majority)
- Indigenous Development: PHWR scaled from 220 MW to 540 MW and 700 MW
- Cost Advantage: 700 MW PHWR costs ~$2 million per MW (globally competitive)
- Investment Requirement: ~$200 billion needed to add ~90 GW capacity
Challenges in Scaling Nuclear Power
- Implementation Delays: 10 PHWR reactors approved in 2017 yet to begin construction
- High Cost Imports: Foreign reactor designs (EDF, Westinghouse, GE-Hitachi) exceed $5 million per MW
- Financing Issues: High upfront capital costs require innovative financial models
- Regulatory Gaps: Need clarity on tariffs, fuel ownership, waste management, liability, and dispute resolution
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Industrial Integration
- R&D Investment: ₹20,000 crore allocated for indigenous SMR development
- Capacity Targets: 5 MW, 55 MW, and 200 MW SMR designs by 2033
- Industrial Demand: Interest from steel, cement, petrochemicals, paper, and data centres
- PHWR Potential: 220 MW model suitable for modularisation and captive applications
- Efficiency Gains: Construction timelines can be reduced to ~40 months
Three-Front Strategy for Nuclear Expansion
- Indigenisation: Adapt foreign reactor designs to reduce costs and build domestic ecosystem
- Research Focus: Develop SMRs, molten-salt reactors, and advanced nuclear technologies
- Captive Nuclear Deployment: Replace fossil-fuel-based captive plants with modular nuclear units
Thorium and Technological Alternatives
- Resource Base: India has significant thorium reserves
- Alternative Pathway: Thorium cladding with HALEU as substitute to breeder reactor route
- Strategic Potential: Enables early utilisation of domestic thorium resources
Regulatory and Governance Challenges
- Civilian vs Strategic Separation: Need clarity between defence-related and civilian nuclear activities
- Policy Framework: Transparent rules required on tariffs, fuel ownership, waste disposal, and liability
- Regulatory Autonomy: Ensuring independence of nuclear regulator
- Outcome Dependence: Effectiveness of SHANTI Act hinges on clarity and transparency in implementation
UPSC Prelims Quiz
Practice exam-oriented current affairs questions daily and track your preparation effectively.
Attempt Quiz →