India’s Nuclear Energy Transition And Thorium Pathway
Context
The SHANTI Act 2025 marks a major shift in India’s atomic energy programme by opening participation to public and private sectors, academia, and industry. It aims to create a broader ecosystem to support nuclear energy development.
Source: Expert Explains | How thorium can power India’s 100 GWe by 2047 mission
SHANTI Act and Regulatory Framework
- Expands nuclear energy participation beyond traditional state control.
- Encourages collaboration across public, private, academic, and industrial stakeholders.
- Legislative support must be complemented by a non-monopolistic and enabling regulatory framework.
Dependence on Uranium and Sustainability Concerns
- India’s nuclear capacity growth relies significantly on imported uranium.
- Domestic uranium reserves are low-grade and expensive to extract.
- The 100 GWe by 2047 mission requires about 18,000–20,000 tonnes of uranium annually.
- Global nuclear capacity is projected to increase significantly, intensifying competition for uranium resources.
- Known global uranium reserves can sustain current once-through usage for only about three decades.
- Once-through uranium use is unsustainable.
- Securing uranium supply will become increasingly difficult.
Thorium Recycling as a Strategic Alternative
- Nuclear recycling enhances fuel efficiency by 50–100 times.
- Limited adoption globally due to proliferation concerns.
- India possesses the largest thorium reserves globally.
- Thorium use enables long-term energy independence.
- It also minimises risks of weapons proliferation.
- Resolving challenges in thorium utilisation requires urgent and multidisciplinary innovation.
Role of Fast Breeder Reactors (FBRs)
- Integral to India’s three-stage nuclear programme.
- Prototype 500 MWe Fast Breeder Reactor is nearing completion.
- Metal-fuelled FBRs and advanced fuel recycling technologies are required for future expansion.
- Large-scale deployment aligned with economic demand may take around three decades.
- FBRs are intended to produce uranium-233 through thorium irradiation.
Expanding Role of PHWRs and Thorium Irradiation
- The 100 GWe mission is expanding Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor capacity beyond earlier projections.
- PHWRs can irradiate thorium to generate uranium-233.
- This can accelerate transition to third-stage Thorium Molten Salt Reactor-based Small Modular Reactors.
- It helps reduce the slowdown between stages of the nuclear programme.
HALEU–Thorium Fuel Approach
- Thorium can be used with High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium in PHWRs without major design changes.
- This approach improves economic efficiency and safety.
- It reduces proliferation risk.
- It enables higher burnup levels.
- It results in lower spent fuel and backend costs.
- Requires accelerated irradiation testing and demonstration.
- India currently lacks such testing facilities and may rely on international cooperation.
SMRs, Hydrogen Production and Recycling Technologies
- Small Modular Reactors need to be developed alongside thorium-based systems.
- These reactors can enable low-cost green hydrogen production through thermochemical routes.
- Pyrochemical nuclear recycling can serve as a common backend technology.
- Irradiated HALEU–thorium fuel can also be recycled using this process.
- These developments are challenging but achievable with focused effort.
- Policy emphasis is reflected in the 2025–26 budget.
Key Details
- SHANTI Act 2025 expands nuclear sector participation.
- Nuclear capacity target: 100 GWe by 2047.
- Annual uranium requirement: 18,000–20,000 tonnes.
- Global uranium resources: about 8 million tonnes.
- Current global nuclear capacity: about 380 GWe, projected to reach around 1,400 GWe.
- Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor capacity: 500 MWe.
Fertiliser Sector Vulnerability And Reform Imperatives
Context
The ongoing West Asia conflict has exposed India’s vulnerabilities in energy and fertiliser supply chains, highlighting the need for structural reforms to ensure food security.
Source: Disruption caused by West Asia war carries a reminder: Policy reforms in fertiliser sector are overdue, The Indian Express
Impact of West Asia Conflict on Supplies
- The conflict threatens disruption of energy and fertiliser supplies.
- Key maritime chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz are at risk, affecting global trade flows.
- Oil, gas, and fertiliser markets, especially urea, have already experienced price volatility.
India’s Dependence on Energy Imports
- Around 88% of India’s crude oil requirement is met through imports.
- In FY25, India imported about 243 million tonnes of crude oil worth $137 billion.
- Nearly half of these imports come from the Middle East via the Strait of Hormuz.
- Brent crude prices rose sharply from $66 per barrel to about $120 before stabilising near $100.
- India imports about two-thirds of its LPG (31.3 Mt in FY25), leading to a domestic price increase of ₹60 per cylinder.
Natural Gas Disruptions and Impact on Fertiliser Production
- India imported about 27 Mt of LNG in FY25, roughly half of its requirement, worth around $15 billion.
- Qatar accounts for nearly half of LNG imports.
- LNG prices increased from $10/mmBtu to $24–25/mmBtu within two weeks.
- Government prioritisation of gas allocation for households and transport has reduced supply to fertiliser producers to 70% of normal levels.
- This is likely to adversely impact domestic urea production.
Fertiliser Dependence and Food Security Risks
- India consumes about 40 Mt of urea annually, while domestic production is around 30 Mt.
- Urea imports are expected to exceed 10 Mt in FY26, compared to 5.6 Mt in FY25.
- Over 60% of urea imports come from the Persian Gulf region.
- Global urea prices rose from $484/tonne to $652/tonne within 10 days.
- Natural gas, the key input for urea, is 85% import-dependent.
- Effective import dependence in urea rises to about 55% when feedstock imports are included.
- Over 80% of ammonia and sulphur imports come from the Gulf.
- Around 40% of DAP imports are sourced from Saudi Arabia.
- Potassic fertilisers (MOP) are almost entirely imported.
- Phosphatic raw materials are 90–95% import-dependent.
- Overall, India depends on global supply chains for about 68–70% of fertiliser requirements in FY25.
Economic Implications
- India exported agri-products worth $11.8 billion to the Middle East in FY25, which are under strain.
- Prolonged crisis could increase the fertiliser subsidy bill in FY27 beyond ₹2 lakh crore against a budgeted ₹1.7 lakh crore.
Policy Reform Imperatives
Diversification and Investment Strategy
- Diversify fertiliser and energy imports beyond Gulf countries.
- Expand overseas investments in fertiliser minerals and production assets.
- Accelerate domestic exploration of fertiliser resources.
- Proposal for a dedicated fertiliser investment fund of about $1 billion.
Fertiliser Pricing and Subsidy Reforms
- Direct transfer of fertiliser subsidies to farmers.
- Gradual deregulation of fertiliser prices to promote balanced nutrient use (N, P, K).
- Reduce leakages, currently estimated at about 20%.
Alternative Policy Options
- Introduce quantitative restrictions on fertiliser sales based on farm size, cropping patterns, and recommended nutrient doses.
- Use AgriStack for targeted allocation mechanisms.
Reform of Urea Subsidy Framework
- Bring urea under the Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) scheme.
- Align urea pricing with phosphatic and potassic fertilisers.
- Promote balanced fertiliser usage.
Key Details
- Crude oil imports: 243 Mt worth $137 billion (FY25).
- LPG imports: 31.3 Mt (about two-thirds of requirement).
- LNG imports: 27 Mt worth $15 billion.
- Urea consumption: 40 Mt; domestic production: 30 Mt.
- Urea import dependence: ~55% (including feedstock).
- Total fertiliser import dependence: 68–70% (FY25).
NavIC System Challenges And Atomic Clock Failure
India’s regional navigation system NavIC has faced recurring technical issues, with the recent failure of the atomic clock onboard IRNSS-1F leading to loss of its positioning capability.
Source: NavIC satellite loses its atomic clock: What this means for India’s bid for its own GPS, The Indian Express
IRNSS/NavIC: System Overview
- Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS), operationally called NavIC, is a regional satellite navigation system.
- Designed as a seven-satellite constellation.
- Provides positioning data over India and up to 1500 km beyond.
- Intended to deliver location accuracy of about 10 metres over India and surrounding regions.
- Satellites are positioned to provide better signal availability over India, including difficult terrains.
Recent Atomic Clock Failure
- Atomic clock onboard IRNSS-1F stopped functioning on March 13, 2026.
- As a result, the satellite can no longer provide positioning data.
- The satellite will continue to operate for one-way messaging services.
- Atomic clocks are essential for accurate positioning, navigation, mapping, and infrastructure planning.
Status of NavIC Constellation
- Before the failure, five satellites provided positioning data: IRNSS-1B, 1C, 1F, 1I, and NVS-01.
- Loss of IRNSS-1F further reduces operational capability.
- Early satellites have faced repeated atomic clock failures.
- Several satellites are aging beyond their 10-year mission life.
- IRNSS-1A is almost defunct; 1B and 1C have also crossed their mission life.
- IRNSS-1H launch in 2017 failed due to heat shield malfunction.
- IRNSS-1I (2018) was launched as a replacement.
Failure of NVS-02 Satellite
- NVS-02, launched in January 2025, failed to reach its final orbit.
- The failure was due to an electrical issue preventing engine ignition.
- Signal did not reach the pyro valve of the oxidiser line due to connector failure.
- As a result, the satellite could not provide positioning data.
Issues in User Segment Development
- Delay in development of user receivers affected system utilisation.
- Although funding was approved in 2006, work began only in 2017.
- Several satellite mission lifespans were underutilised.
- NavIC is currently used in aviation, shipping, railways, and supported in some mobile devices.
Advancements in New-Generation Satellites
- Introduction of indigenously developed atomic clocks.
- Increased mission life from 10 years to 12 years.
- Addition of L1 frequency along with existing L5 and S bands.
- L1 band improves interoperability with global systems like GPS.
- Enables usage in low-power devices such as wearables.
Geopolitics And Oil Price Dynamics
Crude oil prices have surged sharply amid the West Asia conflict, reflecting not only supply disruptions but also growing geopolitical uncertainties influencing global energy markets.
Source: Oil prices reflect geopolitical risks, not only supply, The Hindu
Recent Trends in Oil Prices
- Brent crude rose from about $57.56 in mid-December 2025 to as high as $118 per barrel.
- Prices have moderated slightly but remain above $100 with no immediate easing.
- Geopolitical shocks typically cause sharp spikes followed by gradual stabilisation, but current conditions show prolonged volatility.
Changing Nature of Geopolitical Influence
- Earlier conflicts rarely removed Gulf oil from global supply.
- Current disruptions have created tangible barriers to supply.
- Oil trade is now affected by costs, confidence, and operational conditions.
- Oil security now includes financial, logistical, and political uncertainties, not just physical access.
Vulnerability of Maritime Chokepoints
- Around one-fifth of global oil consumption passes through the Strait of Hormuz.
- About one-tenth of seaborne crude moves through the Bab el-Mandeb and Suez corridor.
- Ongoing conflict has effectively sidelined about 20% of global supplies.
- Oil prices now react sharply to geopolitical signals even without actual production cuts.
Logistical and Cost Implications
- Geopolitical tensions disrupt maritime security and trade routes.
- Shipping rerouting increases freight rates and delays.
- Supertanker freight rates have more than doubled.
- Shipping insurance premiums have risen due to war risks.
- Emergency conflict and war-risk surcharges imposed by carriers.
- These factors increase landed import costs.
Oil as a Political Instrument
- Oil trade is increasingly shaped by geopolitical strategies.
- Example: Russian crude redirection to Asia after the Ukraine conflict.
- Maintained volumes but increased logistical complexity and costs.
- Stability in supply volumes does not imply operational stability.
Financialisation of Oil Markets
- Oil is traded as both a physical commodity and financial asset.
- Futures, options, and derivatives amplify market sensitivity.
- Prices increasingly reflect expectations and investor behaviour.
- Speculative activity rises even when physical supply is stable.
- Weakens traditional link between supply-demand balance and prices.
Role of Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR)
- Originally meant for physical supply disruptions.
- Now used to stabilise market sentiment.
- G-7 announced release of 400 million barrels in response to the conflict.
- Equivalent to about 20 days of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz.
- Announcement itself influenced prices by easing market sentiment.
Role of Major Powers and Institutions
- United States influences markets through production, reserves, and diplomacy.
- Asia drives demand growth and incremental consumption.
- OPEC continues supply coordination, now interacting with geopolitical risk factors.
Energy Transition and Continued Relevance of Oil
- Renewable energy and electric mobility are expanding.
- Oil remains essential for transport, aviation, and petrochemicals.
- Global oil demand exceeds 105 million barrels per day.
- Petrochemicals account for a growing share of consumption.
- Market is segmented between declining fuel demand and rising industrial demand.
Implications for India
- Oil demand in India is expected to continue growing.
- Energy security requires diversification of crude sources.
- Ability to process diverse crude grades enhances resilience.
- Strategic reserves provide buffer against shocks.
- Need for stronger commercial and financial capabilities in oil trade.
- Energy policy must integrate diplomacy, maritime awareness, and market analysis.
Evolving Concept of Energy Security
Energy security now includes:
— Protection from supply disruptions
— Resilience against financial and logistical shocks
Payment systems, shipping insurance, and contract enforcement are critical components.
Oil prices increasingly reflect geopolitical risk and market sentiment rather than just physical supply.
Water-Centric Climate Resilience Framework
COP 30 in Belém (2025) marked a shift in climate adaptation by placing water at the centre of resilience, integrating WASH into global adaptation indicators and accountability frameworks.
Source: Building India’s climate resilience with water at the core, The Hindu
Shift in Climate Adaptation Approach
- Adaptation is now viewed as a measurable and accountable discipline.
- Water has moved from peripheral infrastructure concern to a central element of climate survival.
- Integration of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) into global adaptation indicators.
- Reframing of the water-food-climate nexus with global implications.
Climate Change Through the Water Lens
- Climate impacts manifest primarily through water-related events.
- Floods, droughts, glacial melt, saline intrusion, and erratic monsoons disrupt ecosystems and economies.
- Agriculture contributes about 40% of anthropogenic methane emissions.
- Water-related strategies include improving water use efficiency, wastewater reuse, aquifer recharge, and resilient sanitation systems.
Belém Adaptation Indicators and Global Governance
- 59 Belém Adaptation Indicators introduced under the UAE Framework for Global Climate Resilience.
- Climate-resilient water and sanitation systems:
- Address water scarcity and extreme events such as floods and droughts.
- Ensure universal access to safe drinking water.
- Upgrade sanitation infrastructure to withstand climate shocks.
- Risk governance framework:
- Universal multi-hazard early warning systems by 2027.
- Strengthening hydrometeorological services.
- National vulnerability assessments to be updated by 2030.
- Emphasis shifts from asset creation to system performance under stress.
India’s Institutional and Policy Foundations
- Creation of the Ministry of Jal Shakti (2019) enabled integrated water governance.
- Water Vision 2047 aligns with sustainability, equity, and resilience principles.
- Groundwater management: NAQUIM 2.0 shifts focus from mapping to aquifer-level management planning.
- River management:
- National Mission for Clean Ganga integrates biodiversity, digital monitoring, and global collaboration.
- Focus on river systems as buffers against climate variability.
- Key Systemic Challenges
- Water scarcity remains severe and unevenly distributed.
- Most climate disasters in India are water-related.
- Need for climate stress testing of water infrastructure and diversification of supply systems.
- Adaptation finance:
- Global target of $1.3 trillion annually by 2035 lacks clear implementation pathways.
- Limited predictable funding risks prioritising post-disaster recovery over long-term resilience.
- Water projects need recognition as climate investments.
- Digital fragmentation:
- Limited integration of hydrological and meteorological data using AI.
- Weak linkage between data systems and planning or governance processes.
Need for Policy Convergence and Integration
- Existing Indian missions already align with global adaptation targets.
- Areas include drinking water, sanitation, irrigation, urban water reforms, and climate action.
- Climate stress indicators need integration into mission monitoring systems.
- Opportunity to leverage digital public infrastructure:
- Integration of hydrological data, crop advisories, insurance, and financial flows.
- Development of interoperable platforms for real-time decision-making.
Strategic Significance of Belém Indicators
- Serve as a framework for operationalising climate resilience.
- Shift adaptation from peripheral policy to core development strategy.
- Emphasis on system functionality during climate stress rather than infrastructure expansion.
- India is positioned to scale adaptation through existing reforms, technology, and community initiatives.
— COP 30 held in Belém, Brazil (November 2025).
— 59 Belém Adaptation Indicators under UAE Framework.
— Agriculture contributes ~40% of anthropogenic methane emissions.
— Target for global adaptation finance: $1.3 trillion annually by 2035.
— Early warning systems target year: 2027.
— Vulnerability assessment update target: 2030.
Right To Die With Dignity And Passive Euthanasia
The Supreme Court permitted withdrawal of life support in the Harish Rana case, reaffirming the constitutional position on the right to die with dignity under Article 21.
Source: On the right to die with dignity, The Hindu
Evolution of Right to Life with Dignity
- In Gian Kaur vs State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 includes the right to live with dignity.
- However, it rejected the inclusion of the right to die within Article 21.
Recognition of Passive Euthanasia
- In Aruna R. Shanbaug vs Union of India (2011), the Supreme Court recognised passive euthanasia.
- Permitted withdrawal of life support for patients in terminal conditions or prolonged ineffective treatment.
- Guidelines were issued to regulate such decisions in the absence of legislation.
- Law Commission reports (2006, 2012) supported withholding life support in the patient’s best interest without criminal liability.
Common Cause Judgment (2018 and 2023)
- In Common Cause vs Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court recognised the right to refuse medical treatment as part of Article 21.
- Linked dignity with privacy, autonomy, and self-determination.
- Allowed withdrawal or withholding of medical treatment under constitutional protection.
- 2023 judgment refined procedural aspects.
- Core principles of Common Cause guidelines:
- Intervention must qualify as medical treatment.
- Withdrawal must be in the patient’s best interest.
- Safeguards include:
- Approval from primary and secondary Medical Boards.
- Detailed procedural requirements to prevent misuse.
- Court highlighted the absence of a specific legislative framework.
Harish Rana Case: Legal Interpretation
- The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of life support under Common Cause guidelines.
- Key legal issues:
- Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (CANH) was classified as medical treatment due to need for medical supervision and expertise.
- Determination of “best interest” based on views of family and medical boards.
- Court’s reasoning:
- Medical treatment is justified only if it provides therapeutic benefit.
- When recovery is impossible, continuation of treatment merely prolongs biological existence without benefit.
- Withdrawal of treatment was considered in the patient’s best interest.
Key Constitutional Principles
- Right to dignity under Article 21 extends to end-of-life decisions.
- Right to refuse treatment reflects autonomy and self-determination.
- Passive euthanasia is legally permitted under judicial guidelines.
- Absence of comprehensive legislation remains a gap in the framework.
— Persistent Vegetative State (PVS): condition with no response to stimuli.
— Common Cause guidelines govern withdrawal of life support.
— Law Commission reports: 2006 and 2012.
Key cases:
• Gian Kaur vs State of Punjab (1996)
• Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India (2011)
• Common Cause vs Union of India (2018, modified 2023)
U.S. Trade Investigations Against India Under Section 301
The United States has initiated investigations against India and other countries to assess trade practices that may be deemed discriminatory or harmful to U.S. commerce, with potential implications for future tariffs.
Source: Why is the U.S. investigating India, The Hindu
Current Tariff Scenario
- U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for imposing reciprocal tariffs.
- India earlier faced tariffs of 50%, later reduced to 25% between August 2025 and February 2026.
- The U.S. imposed a 10% tariff on imports from all countries for 150 days under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
- The U.S. may use other provisions of the Trade Act to impose additional tariffs.
First Investigation: Excess Manufacturing Capacity
- Initiated under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974.
- Covers 16 economies including India.
- Focuses on whether exports based on excess manufacturing capacity are harming U.S. industries.
- U.S. estimates India’s trade surplus at $58 billion in 2025, while Indian data estimates $42.2 billion.
- Surplus sectors include textiles, health, construction goods and automotive goods.
- Solar module manufacturing capacity is nearly three times domestic demand.
- Excess capacity is also observed in petrochemicals, steel and other industries.
Second Investigation: Forced Labour Concerns
- Initiated under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974.
- Covers about 60 countries including India.
- Examines whether countries have taken sufficient steps to prevent imports of goods produced using forced labour.
- Focuses on the impact of such practices on U.S. workers and businesses.
Significance of Section 301(b)
- Section 301 allows action against foreign practices that are unjustifiable, unreasonable or discriminatory.
- Provides legal basis for retaliatory measures such as tariffs.
- Investigations may lead to new tariffs after the expiry of the current 10% tariff period.
India’s Response
- No official public response from the Indian government so far.
- The European Union has expressed concern and indicated possible countermeasures if commitments are breached.
Industry Response in India
- Concerns over additional uncertainty in sectors such as textiles, steel, aluminium and automobiles.
- Existing tariffs continue, including a 50% tariff on steel, aluminium and auto-related products.
- Textile sector faces stress due to external factors and policy uncertainty.
- Some experts indicate no immediate impact as investigations are likely to be prolonged.
— Investigations initiated against 16 and 60 countries respectively.
— Trade surplus with the U.S. is estimated at $58 billion by the U.S. and $42.2 billion by India.
— Global tariff imposed is 10% for 150 days.
— Earlier tariffs on India ranged from 50% to 25%.
— Legal basis: Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974.
Continue Your UPSC Preparation
Stay consistent with your preparation through daily current affairs notes and exam-oriented practice questions designed specifically for the UPSC Civil Services Examination.
- Daily Newspaper Notes – Concise and exam-focused current affairs notes for UPSC Prelims and Mains.
👉 Read Daily Notes - Daily UPSC Prelims Quiz – Practice exam-oriented MCQs based on current affairs for UPSC Prelims.
👉 Attempt Today’s Quiz